Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge - SWEBOK

596 indexed citations
published 2001
Journal
IEEE Press eBooks

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w9706356 →

Countries where authors are citing Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge - SWEBOK

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge - SWEBOK. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge - SWEBOK with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge - SWEBOK more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge - SWEBOK

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge - SWEBOK. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge - SWEBOK.

About Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge - SWEBOK

This paper, published in 2001, received 596 indexed citations . Written by Alain Abran, Pierre Bourque, Robert Dupuis and James W. Moore. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (457 citations), Software (152 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (125 citations). Published in IEEE Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w9706356.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026