The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organizations

614 indexed citations
published 1987
Journal
Jossey-Bass eBooks

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w9566817 →

Countries where authors are citing The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organizations

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organizations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organizations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organizations more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organizations

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organizations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organizations.

About The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organizations

This paper, published in 1987, received 614 indexed citations . Written by James M. Kouzes and Barry Z. Posner. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (278 citations), Education (129 citations) and Strategy and Management (129 citations). Published in Jossey-Bass eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w9566817.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026