The Wellborn science : eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9559697 →Countries where authors are citing The Wellborn science : eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia
This map shows the geographic impact of The Wellborn science : eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Wellborn science : eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Wellborn science : eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Wellborn science : eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia
This network shows the impact of The Wellborn science : eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Wellborn science : eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia.
About The Wellborn science : eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia
This paper, published in 1990, received 128 indexed citations . Written by Mark B. Adams, William H. Schneider, Paul Weindling, Philip R. Reilly and Nicole Rafter covering the research area of History. It is primarily cited by scholars working on History (64 citations), Political Science and International Relations (35 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (34 citations). Published in Journal of the History of Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9559697.