NEW PROCEDURES FOR MEASUREMENT OF HUMAN PLASMA ANGIOTENSIN AND RENIN ACTIVITY LEVELS.
Impact in
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w95577910 →Countries where authors are citing NEW PROCEDURES FOR MEASUREMENT OF HUMAN PLASMA ANGIOTENSIN AND RENIN ACTIVITY LEVELS.
This map shows the geographic impact of NEW PROCEDURES FOR MEASUREMENT OF HUMAN PLASMA ANGIOTENSIN AND RENIN ACTIVITY LEVELS.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by NEW PROCEDURES FOR MEASUREMENT OF HUMAN PLASMA ANGIOTENSIN AND RENIN ACTIVITY LEVELS. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NEW PROCEDURES FOR MEASUREMENT OF HUMAN PLASMA ANGIOTENSIN AND RENIN ACTIVITY LEVELS. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing NEW PROCEDURES FOR MEASUREMENT OF HUMAN PLASMA ANGIOTENSIN AND RENIN ACTIVITY LEVELS.
This network shows the impact of NEW PROCEDURES FOR MEASUREMENT OF HUMAN PLASMA ANGIOTENSIN AND RENIN ACTIVITY LEVELS.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the NEW PROCEDURES FOR MEASUREMENT OF HUMAN PLASMA ANGIOTENSIN AND RENIN ACTIVITY LEVELS..
About NEW PROCEDURES FOR MEASUREMENT OF HUMAN PLASMA ANGIOTENSIN AND RENIN ACTIVITY LEVELS.
This paper, published in 1964, received 376 indexed citations . Written by R. Boucher, Robert Veyrat, J de Champlain and Jacques J. Genest. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (145 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (130 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (117 citations), Molecular Biology (89 citations) and Surgery (57 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w95577910.