Are Games Effective Learning Tools? A Review of Educational Games.
- Authors
- Sara de Freitas
- Journal
- Educational Technology & Society
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9268814 →Countries where authors are citing Are Games Effective Learning Tools? A Review of Educational Games.
This map shows the geographic impact of Are Games Effective Learning Tools? A Review of Educational Games.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Are Games Effective Learning Tools? A Review of Educational Games. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Are Games Effective Learning Tools? A Review of Educational Games. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Are Games Effective Learning Tools? A Review of Educational Games.
This network shows the impact of Are Games Effective Learning Tools? A Review of Educational Games.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Are Games Effective Learning Tools? A Review of Educational Games..
About Are Games Effective Learning Tools? A Review of Educational Games.
This paper, published in 2018, received 176 indexed citations . Written by Sara de Freitas covering the research area of Developmental and Educational Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (123 citations), Sociology and Political Science (56 citations) and Computer Science Applications (44 citations). Published in Educational Technology & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9268814.