The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks
Impact in
- Plant Science 757
- Food Science 221
- Journal
- Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9184329 →Countries where authors are citing The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks
This map shows the geographic impact of The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks
This network shows the impact of The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks.
About The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks
This paper, published in 1986, received 912 indexed citations . Written by Robert E. Hardenburg, Alley E. Watada and Chien Yi Wang. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (757 citations), Food Science (221 citations), Biochemistry (123 citations), Biomaterials (113 citations) and Molecular Biology (57 citations). Published in Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9184329.