Automated Whitebox Fuzz Testing.
Impact in
- Software 559
Classified as
- Journal
- Network and Distributed System Security Symposium
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9153278 →Countries where authors are citing Automated Whitebox Fuzz Testing.
This map shows the geographic impact of Automated Whitebox Fuzz Testing.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Automated Whitebox Fuzz Testing. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Automated Whitebox Fuzz Testing. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Automated Whitebox Fuzz Testing.
This network shows the impact of Automated Whitebox Fuzz Testing.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Automated Whitebox Fuzz Testing..
About Automated Whitebox Fuzz Testing.
This paper, published in 2008, received 681 indexed citations . Written by Patrice Godefroid and Michael Y. Levin covering the research area of Software and Signal Processing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Software (559 citations), Signal Processing (326 citations), Information Systems (298 citations), Artificial Intelligence (176 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (111 citations). Published in Network and Distributed System Security Symposium.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9153278.