The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- American Economic Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9139670 →Countries where authors are citing The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments
This map shows the geographic impact of The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments
This network shows the impact of The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments.
About The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments
This paper, published in 1972, received 659 indexed citations . Written by Thomas E. Borcherding and Robert T. Deacon covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (590 citations), Political Science and International Relations (352 citations), Gender Studies (78 citations), Sociology and Political Science (54 citations) and Accounting (51 citations). Published in American Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9139670.