Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w91352246 →Countries where authors are citing Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution
This map shows the geographic impact of Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution
This network shows the impact of Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution.
About Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution
This paper, published in 2006, received 641 indexed citations . Written by Jeanne W. Ross, Peter Weill and David Robertson covering the research area of Management Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Information Systems (513 citations), Information Systems (199 citations) and Strategy and Management (104 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w91352246.