Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software
- Journal
- Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w91068299 →Countries where authors are citing Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software
This map shows the geographic impact of Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software
This network shows the impact of Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software.
About Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software
This paper, published in 1994, received 12.8k indexed citations . Written by Erich Gamma, Richard F. Helm, Ralph E. Johnson and John Vlissides covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications, Software and Development. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (6.8k citations), Information Systems (6.7k citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (3.9k citations). Published in Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w91068299.