Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
- Education
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Political Science and International Relations
- Authors
- Haris Herdiansyah
- Journal
- Andalas University Repository (Andalas University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w90206967 →Countries where authors are citing Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
This map shows the geographic impact of Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
This network shows the impact of Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial.
About Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
This paper, published in 2011, received 380 indexed citations . Written by Haris Herdiansyah covering the research area of Education, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (152 citations), Education (151 citations) and Demography (70 citations). Published in Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w90206967.