Complementary feeding of young children in developing countries: a review of current scientific knowledge.
- Authors
- K H BrownK G DeweyLuke Allen
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w89164483 →Countries where authors are citing Complementary feeding of young children in developing countries: a review of current scientific knowledge.
This map shows the geographic impact of Complementary feeding of young children in developing countries: a review of current scientific knowledge.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Complementary feeding of young children in developing countries: a review of current scientific knowledge. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Complementary feeding of young children in developing countries: a review of current scientific knowledge. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Complementary feeding of young children in developing countries: a review of current scientific knowledge.
This network shows the impact of Complementary feeding of young children in developing countries: a review of current scientific knowledge.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Complementary feeding of young children in developing countries: a review of current scientific knowledge..
About Complementary feeding of young children in developing countries: a review of current scientific knowledge.
This paper, published in 1998, received 699 indexed citations . Written by K H Brown, K G Dewey and Luke Allen. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nutrition and Dietetics (575 citations), Epidemiology (222 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (183 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w89164483.