Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications
- Authors
- Yunus A. ÇengelJohn M. Cimbala
- Journal
- Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w88541442 →Countries where authors are citing Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications
This map shows the geographic impact of Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications
This network shows the impact of Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications.
About Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications
This paper, published in 2004, received 917 indexed citations . Written by Yunus A. Çengel and John M. Cimbala covering the research area of Mechanics of Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computational Mechanics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanical Engineering (335 citations), Computational Mechanics (233 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (182 citations). Published in Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w88541442.