Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society
- Authors
- Richard ShillcockN Chater
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w88054194 →Countries where authors are citing Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society
This map shows the geographic impact of Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society
This network shows the impact of Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society.
About Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society
This paper, published in 1992, received 501 indexed citations . Written by Richard Shillcock and N Chater. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (221 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (169 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (158 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w88054194.