Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type
- Authors
- Herbert G. BakerIrene Baker
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w87516213 →Countries where authors are citing Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type
This map shows the geographic impact of Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type
This network shows the impact of Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type.
About Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type
This paper, published in 1983, received 452 indexed citations . Written by Herbert G. Baker and Irene Baker covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Food Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (403 citations), Plant Science (266 citations) and Molecular Biology (111 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w87516213.