Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects.
Impact in
- Physiology 303
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w87463410 →Countries where authors are citing Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects.
This map shows the geographic impact of Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects.
This network shows the impact of Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects..
About Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects.
This paper, published in 1985, received 480 indexed citations . Written by Ronald E. LaPorte, Henry J. Montoye and Carl J. Caspersen covering the research area of Physiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (303 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (253 citations), General Health Professions (79 citations), Applied Psychology (65 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (61 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w87463410.