Vogel's textbook of quantitative chemical analysis
- Authors
- Arthur I. VogelGeorge H. Jeffery
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w87424564 →Countries where authors are citing Vogel's textbook of quantitative chemical analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Vogel's textbook of quantitative chemical analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vogel's textbook of quantitative chemical analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vogel's textbook of quantitative chemical analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Vogel's textbook of quantitative chemical analysis
This network shows the impact of Vogel's textbook of quantitative chemical analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Vogel's textbook of quantitative chemical analysis.
About Vogel's textbook of quantitative chemical analysis
This paper, published in 1989, received 1.9k indexed citations . Written by Arthur I. Vogel and George H. Jeffery covering the research area of Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (569 citations), Materials Chemistry (358 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (295 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w87424564.