A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing.

836 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1996, received 836 indexed citations. Written by John R. Hayes covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (654 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (442 citations) and Language and Linguistics (285 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w87361515 →

Countries where authors are citing A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w87361515.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026