The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews
- Journal
- Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w86933527 →Countries where authors are citing The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews
This map shows the geographic impact of The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews
This network shows the impact of The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews.
About The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews
This paper, published in 2015, received 918 indexed citations . Written by Micah D.J. Peters, Christina Godfrey, Patricia McInerney, Cássia Baldini Soares and Hanan Khalil. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (285 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (203 citations) and Clinical Psychology (131 citations). Published in Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w86933527.