A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review

265 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2016, received 265 indexed citations. Written by Fılız Kalelıoğlu, Yasemin Gülbahar and Volkan Kukul covering the research area of Computer Science Applications and Developmental and Educational Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Science Applications (238 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (100 citations) and Molecular Biology (45 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w86691618 →

Countries where authors are citing A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w86691618.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026