Surveillance for waterborne-disease outbreaks--United States, 1993-1994.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w86101884 →Countries where authors are citing Surveillance for waterborne-disease outbreaks--United States, 1993-1994.
This map shows the geographic impact of Surveillance for waterborne-disease outbreaks--United States, 1993-1994.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Surveillance for waterborne-disease outbreaks--United States, 1993-1994. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Surveillance for waterborne-disease outbreaks--United States, 1993-1994. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Surveillance for waterborne-disease outbreaks--United States, 1993-1994.
This network shows the impact of Surveillance for waterborne-disease outbreaks--United States, 1993-1994.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Surveillance for waterborne-disease outbreaks--United States, 1993-1994..
About Surveillance for waterborne-disease outbreaks--United States, 1993-1994.
This paper, published in 1996, received 1.7k indexed citations . Written by Michael H. Kramer, Barbara L. Herwaldt, Gunther F. Craun, Rebecca L. Calderon and Dennis D. Juranek covering the research area of Water Science and Technology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Parasitology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Infectious Diseases (704 citations), Epidemiology (619 citations) and Hepatology (228 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w86101884.