Formic acid pretreatment enhances immunostaining of cerebral and systemic amyloids.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w85899542 →Countries where authors are citing Formic acid pretreatment enhances immunostaining of cerebral and systemic amyloids.
This map shows the geographic impact of Formic acid pretreatment enhances immunostaining of cerebral and systemic amyloids.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Formic acid pretreatment enhances immunostaining of cerebral and systemic amyloids. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Formic acid pretreatment enhances immunostaining of cerebral and systemic amyloids. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Formic acid pretreatment enhances immunostaining of cerebral and systemic amyloids.
This network shows the impact of Formic acid pretreatment enhances immunostaining of cerebral and systemic amyloids.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Formic acid pretreatment enhances immunostaining of cerebral and systemic amyloids..
About Formic acid pretreatment enhances immunostaining of cerebral and systemic amyloids.
This paper, published in 1987, received 427 indexed citations . Written by Tetsuyuki Kitamoto, Koji Ogomori, Jun Tateishi and Stanley B. Prusiner covering the research area of Virology, Physiology and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (308 citations), Physiology (239 citations) and Neurology (110 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w85899542.