Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960-2002.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w85771394 →Countries where authors are citing Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960-2002.
This map shows the geographic impact of Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960-2002.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960-2002. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960-2002. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960-2002.
This network shows the impact of Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960-2002.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960-2002..
About Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960-2002.
This paper, published in 2004, received 579 indexed citations . Written by Cynthia L. Ogden, Cheryl D. Fryar, Margaret D. Carroll and Katherine M. Flegal covering the research area of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (184 citations), Physiology (113 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (62 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w85771394.