Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales.
Impact in
- Surgery 342
Classified as
- Authors
- Wong Dl
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w85626219 →Countries where authors are citing Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales.
This map shows the geographic impact of Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales.
This network shows the impact of Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales..
About Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales.
This paper, published in 1988, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Wong Dl covering the research area of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (711 citations), Surgery (342 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (266 citations), Oral Surgery (134 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (131 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w85626219.