Identification of a new human coronavirus
- Journal
- Nature Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nm1024 →Countries where authors are citing Identification of a new human coronavirus
This map shows the geographic impact of Identification of a new human coronavirus. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Identification of a new human coronavirus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Identification of a new human coronavirus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Identification of a new human coronavirus
This network shows the impact of Identification of a new human coronavirus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Identification of a new human coronavirus.
About Identification of a new human coronavirus
This paper, published in 2004, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Lia van der Hoek, Krzysztof Pyrć, Maarten F. Jebbink, Ron J. M. Berkhout, Katja C. Wolthers, Pauline M. E. Wertheim‐van Dillen, Joke Spaargaren and Ben Berkhout covering the research area of Animal Science and Zoology and Infectious Diseases. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Infectious Diseases (1.0k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (396 citations) and Epidemiology (387 citations). Published in Nature Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nm1024.