Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition

603 indexed citations
published 1995
Journal
Oxford University Press eBooks

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w8553043 →

Countries where authors are citing Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition.

About Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition

This paper, published in 1995, received 603 indexed citations . Written by Michael D. Rugg and Michael Coles. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (545 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (131 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (128 citations). Published in Oxford University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w8553043.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026