Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory
- Authors
- John R. Taylor
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w85315815 →Countries where authors are citing Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory
This map shows the geographic impact of Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory
This network shows the impact of Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory.
About Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory
This paper, published in 1989, received 524 indexed citations . Written by John R. Taylor covering the research area of Communication, Language and Linguistics and Cultural Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Language and Linguistics (363 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (272 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (87 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w85315815.