FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR

1.7k indexed citations
published 1983
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w85007838 →

Countries where authors are citing FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR more than expected).

Fields of papers citing FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR.

About FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR

This paper, published in 1983, received 1.7k indexed citations . Written by W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera covering the research area of Language and Linguistics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (836 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (433 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w85007838.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026