Relevance: Communication and Cognition
Impact in
- Authors
- Dan SperberDeirdre Wilson
- Journal
- UCL Discovery (University College London)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w84570539 →Countries where authors are citing Relevance: Communication and Cognition
This map shows the geographic impact of Relevance: Communication and Cognition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Relevance: Communication and Cognition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Relevance: Communication and Cognition more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Relevance: Communication and Cognition
This network shows the impact of Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Relevance: Communication and Cognition.
About Relevance: Communication and Cognition
This paper, published in 1986, received 3.8k indexed citations . Written by Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Language and Linguistics (1.7k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k citations), Artificial Intelligence (737 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (702 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (574 citations). Published in UCL Discovery (University College London).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w84570539.