The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS); 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w84460906 →Countries where authors are citing The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS); 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation
This map shows the geographic impact of The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS); 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS); 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS); 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS); 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation
This network shows the impact of The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS); 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS); 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation.
About The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS); 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation
This paper, published in 2011, received 387 indexed citations . Written by Matthew J. Breiding, Jieru Chen and Mikel L. Walters. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health (247 citations), Gender Studies (208 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (183 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w84460906.