Intellectual disability : definition, classification, and systems of supports
- Authors
- Developmental Disabilities
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w84415320 →Countries where authors are citing Intellectual disability : definition, classification, and systems of supports
This map shows the geographic impact of Intellectual disability : definition, classification, and systems of supports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Intellectual disability : definition, classification, and systems of supports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intellectual disability : definition, classification, and systems of supports more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Intellectual disability : definition, classification, and systems of supports
This network shows the impact of Intellectual disability : definition, classification, and systems of supports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Intellectual disability : definition, classification, and systems of supports.
About Intellectual disability : definition, classification, and systems of supports
This paper, published in 2010, received 918 indexed citations . Written by Developmental Disabilities. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (338 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (246 citations) and Safety Research (209 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w84415320.