Sanitation and disease: health aspects of excreta and wastewater management.
- Journal
- Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w84324844 →Countries where authors are citing Sanitation and disease: health aspects of excreta and wastewater management.
This map shows the geographic impact of Sanitation and disease: health aspects of excreta and wastewater management.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sanitation and disease: health aspects of excreta and wastewater management. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sanitation and disease: health aspects of excreta and wastewater management. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Sanitation and disease: health aspects of excreta and wastewater management.
This network shows the impact of Sanitation and disease: health aspects of excreta and wastewater management.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sanitation and disease: health aspects of excreta and wastewater management..
About Sanitation and disease: health aspects of excreta and wastewater management.
This paper, published in 1983, received 476 indexed citations . Written by Richard Feachem, David J. Bradley, Hemda Garelick and D. Duncan Mara. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nutrition and Dietetics (179 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (161 citations) and Water Science and Technology (160 citations). Published in Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w84324844.