Decisions 2.0: the power of collective intelligence
- Authors
- Eric Bonabeau
- Journal
- MIT Sloan management review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8390118 →Countries where authors are citing Decisions 2.0: the power of collective intelligence
This map shows the geographic impact of Decisions 2.0: the power of collective intelligence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Decisions 2.0: the power of collective intelligence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Decisions 2.0: the power of collective intelligence more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Decisions 2.0: the power of collective intelligence
This network shows the impact of Decisions 2.0: the power of collective intelligence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Decisions 2.0: the power of collective intelligence.
About Decisions 2.0: the power of collective intelligence
This paper, published in 2009, received 276 indexed citations . Written by Eric Bonabeau covering the research area of Information Systems and Management, Management Information Systems and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Science Applications (126 citations), Communication (85 citations), Sociology and Political Science (60 citations), Strategy and Management (37 citations) and Management Information Systems (34 citations). Published in MIT Sloan management review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8390118.