Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Swarm Intelligence
19993.9k citationsEric Bonabeau, Marco Dorigo et al.Oxford University Press eBooksprofile →
Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems
This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Bonabeau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Bonabeau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Bonabeau more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Bonabeau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Bonabeau. The network helps show where Eric Bonabeau may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eric Bonabeau
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eric Bonabeau.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eric Bonabeau based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Eric Bonabeau. Eric Bonabeau is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bonabeau, Eric. (2009). Decisiones 2.0: el poder de la inteligencia colectiva. Harvard-Deusto business review. 20–29.
5.
Bonabeau, Eric, N. Bodick, & Robert W. Armstrong. (2008). Un enfoque más racional para el desarrollo de nuevos productos. Harvard business review. 86(3). 92–98.1 indexed citations
6.
Bonabeau, Eric. (2007). Understanding and Managing Complexity Risk. MIT Sloan management review. 48(4). 62–68.34 indexed citations
7.
Bonabeau, Eric, et al.. (2007). Expecting the Unexpected: The Need for a Networked Terrorism and Disaster Response Strategy. 3(1).9 indexed citations
8.
Bonabeau, Eric, et al.. (2006). What Is Luxury Without Variety. Harvard business review. 84(4). 21–22.3 indexed citations
9.
Bonabeau, Eric, et al.. (2003). Agent-Based Modeling for Testing and Designing Novel Decentralized Command and Control System Paradigms. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).7 indexed citations
10.
Théraulaz, Guy, Eric Bonabeau, Ricard V. Solé, Bertrand Schatz, & Jean‐Louis Deneubourg. (2002). Task Partitioning in a Ponerine Ant. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 215(4). 481–489.13 indexed citations
11.
Bonabeau, Eric, Marco Dorigo, & Guy Théraulaz. (1999). From Natural to Artificial Swarm Intelligence. Oxford University Press eBooks.177 indexed citations
Bonabeau, Eric, et al.. (1997). Adaptive Task Allocation Inspired by a Model of Division of Labor in Social Insects. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 36–45.86 indexed citations
18.
Bonabeau, Eric, et al.. (1995). Characterizing emergent phenomena (1): a critical review. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).24 indexed citations
19.
Bonabeau, Eric. (1995). Sandpile Dynamics on Random Graphs. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. 64(1). 327–328.33 indexed citations
20.
Théraulaz, Guy, Eric Bonabeau, Simon Goss, & Jean‐Louis Deneubourg. (1994). L'intelligence collective. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 198. 90–95.22 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.