Adhd Rating Scale-IV: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation

1.7k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1998, received 1.7k indexed citations. Written by George J. DuPaul, Thomas J. Power, Arthur D. Anastopoulos and Robert Reid covering the research area of Psychiatry and Mental health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Psychiatry and Mental health (1.4k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (813 citations) and Clinical Psychology (657 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w83355944 →

Countries where authors are citing Adhd Rating Scale-IV: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adhd Rating Scale-IV: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adhd Rating Scale-IV: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adhd Rating Scale-IV: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Adhd Rating Scale-IV: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Adhd Rating Scale-IV: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Adhd Rating Scale-IV: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w83355944.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026