Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w83245417 →Countries where authors are citing Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.
This map shows the geographic impact of Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.
This network shows the impact of Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory..
About Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.
This paper, published in 1994, received 4.4k indexed citations . covering the research area of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cognitive Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pharmacology (1.8k citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1.0k citations) and Physiology (821 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w83245417.