The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success
Impact in
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w83154942 →Countries where authors are citing The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success
This map shows the geographic impact of The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success
This network shows the impact of The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success.
About The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success
This paper, published in 2003, received 636 indexed citations . Written by Andy Neely, Chris Adams and Mike Kennerley. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Information Systems (374 citations), Strategy and Management (266 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (125 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (76 citations) and Accounting (72 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w83154942.