The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy.
- Authors
- Jeremy BrownAmato J. Giaccia
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w82668494 →Countries where authors are citing The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy.
This map shows the geographic impact of The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy.
This network shows the impact of The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy..
About The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy.
This paper, published in 1998, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Jeremy Brown and Amato J. Giaccia covering the research area of Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cancer Research (610 citations), Molecular Biology (584 citations) and Oncology (298 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w82668494.