Abnormal Magnetic-Resonance Scans of the Lumbar Spine in Asymptomatic Subjects

588 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1990, received 588 indexed citations. Written by Scott D. Boden, Thomas S. Dina, Nicholas J. Patronas and Sam W. Wiesel covering the research area of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine (496 citations), Pharmacology (420 citations) and Surgery (306 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w82602658 →

Countries where authors are citing Abnormal Magnetic-Resonance Scans of the Lumbar Spine in Asymptomatic Subjects

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Abnormal Magnetic-Resonance Scans of the Lumbar Spine in Asymptomatic Subjects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Abnormal Magnetic-Resonance Scans of the Lumbar Spine in Asymptomatic Subjects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abnormal Magnetic-Resonance Scans of the Lumbar Spine in Asymptomatic Subjects more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Abnormal Magnetic-Resonance Scans of the Lumbar Spine in Asymptomatic Subjects

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Abnormal Magnetic-Resonance Scans of the Lumbar Spine in Asymptomatic Subjects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Abnormal Magnetic-Resonance Scans of the Lumbar Spine in Asymptomatic Subjects.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w82602658.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026