Thomas S. Dina

2.7k total citations · 2 hit papers
18 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Thomas S. Dina is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas S. Dina has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Surgery, 8 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 4 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Thomas S. Dina's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (4 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers). Thomas S. Dina is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (4 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers). Thomas S. Dina collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas S. Dina's co-authors include Scott D. Boden, David O. Davis, Sam W. Wiesel, Nicholas J. Patronas, Edward R. Laws, James C. Vailas, Panos A. Labropoulos, Alan S. Hilibrand, Steven Brown and David W. Stoller and has published in prestigious journals such as Radiology, Journal of Hepatology and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

In The Last Decade

Thomas S. Dina

18 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Abnormal Magnetic-Resonance Scans of the Lumbar Spine in Asymptomatic Subjects

1990 588 citations Scott D. Boden, Thomas S. Dina et al. profile →
Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.

1990 545 citations Scott D. Boden, David O. Davis et al. PubMed profile →

Peers

Thomas S. Dina

PFM

SURGE

PHARM

BE

EPIDE

George Sapkas Greece

Sait Naderi Türkiye

Jeffery L. Stambough United States

Mehmet Zileli Türkiye

Tsai‐Sheng Fu Taiwan

Elias C. Papadopoulos Greece

Kyung‐Soo Suk South Korea

Robert C. Mulholland United Kingdom

Çağatay Öztürk Türkiye

Hao Liu China

George Sapkas Greece

Thomas S. Dina

1.0k ×0.8

PFM

1.4k ×1.3

SURGE

354 ×0.4

PHARM

108 ×0.3

BE

92 ×0.5

EPIDE

Citations per year, relative to Thomas S. Dina Thomas S. Dina (= 1×) peers George Sapkas

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas S. Dina

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas S. Dina's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas S. Dina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas S. Dina more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas S. Dina

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas S. Dina. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas S. Dina. The network helps show where Thomas S. Dina may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas S. Dina

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas S. Dina. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas S. Dina based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas S. Dina. Thomas S. Dina is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

1.

Bédossa, Pierre, Johanna Arola, Annette Gouw, et al.. (2018). The EPoS staging system is a reproducible 7-tierfibrosis score for NAFLD adapted both to glass slides and digitized images (e-slides). Journal of Hepatology. 68. S553–S553. 10 indexed citations

2.

Hilibrand, Alan S. & Thomas S. Dina. (1998). THE USE OF DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING TO ASSESS SPINAL ARTHRODESIS. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 29(4). 591–601. 43 indexed citations

3.

Dina, Thomas S., Scott D. Boden, & David O. Davis. (1995). Lumbar spine after surgery for herniated disk: imaging findings in the early postoperative period.. American Journal of Roentgenology. 164(3). 665–671. 39 indexed citations

4.

Lee, Jong‐Hoon, Edward R. Laws, Barton L. Guthrie, Thomas S. Dina, & Lucien E. Nochomovitz. (1994). Lymphocytic Hypophysitis. Neurosurgery. 34(1). 159–163. 17 indexed citations

5.

Lee, Jong‐Hoon, Edward R. Laws, Barton L. Guthrie, Thomas S. Dina, & Lucien E. Nochomovitz. (1994). Lymphocytic Hypophysitis. Neurosurgery. 34(1). 159–163. 47 indexed citations

6.

Dina, Thomas S., et al.. (1993). MR of the pituitary gland postsurgery: serial MR studies following transsphenoidal resection.. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 14(3). 763–769. 74 indexed citations

7.

Boden, Scott D., et al.. (1992). Postoperative diskitis: distinguishing early MR imaging findings from normal postoperative disk space changes.. Radiology. 184(3). 765–771. 75 indexed citations

8.

Boden, Scott D., et al.. (1992). Contrast-enhanced MR imaging performed after successful lumbar disk surgery: prospective study.. Radiology. 182(1). 59–64. 92 indexed citations

9.

Boden, Scott D., et al.. (1992). A Prospective and Blinded Investigation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 282. 177???185–177???185. 73 indexed citations

10.

Boden, Scott D., David O. Davis, Thomas S. Dina, et al.. (1992). A prospective and blinded investigation of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Abnormal findings in asymptomatic subjects.. PubMed. 177–85. 105 indexed citations

11.

Dina, Thomas S.. (1991). Primary central nervous system lymphoma versus toxoplasmosis in AIDS.. Radiology. 179(3). 823–828. 104 indexed citations

12.

Boden, Scott D., et al.. (1990). Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.. PubMed. 72(3). 1178–8. 545 indexed citations breakdown →

13.

Boden, Scott D., Thomas S. Dina, Nicholas J. Patronas, & Sam W. Wiesel. (1990). Abnormal Magnetic-Resonance Scans of the Lumbar Spine in Asymptomatic Subjects. 588 indexed citations breakdown →

14.

Boden, Scott D., et al.. (1989). Precise measurement of vertebral bone density using computed tomography without the use of an external reference phantom. Journal of Digital Imaging. 2(1). 31–38. 54 indexed citations

15.

Dina, Thomas S., et al.. (1988). Cerebral mucormycosis: a case report. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics. 12(4). 259–262. 6 indexed citations

16.

Francavilla, T. L., et al.. (1987). MR Imaging of Thoracic Disk Herniations. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 11(6). 1062–1065. 20 indexed citations

17.

Wanke, Christine, Carmelita U. Tuazon, Andrea Kovács, et al.. (1987). Toxoplasma Encephalitis in Patients with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome: Diagnosis and Response to Therapy. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 36(3). 509–516. 90 indexed citations

18.

Dina, Thomas S., et al.. (1985). Lymphomatous Meningitis and Steroid-Induced Epidural Lipomatosis. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 9(3). 595–598. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact