Gender-Responsive Strategies Research, Practice, and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders

528 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2003, received 528 indexed citations. Written by Barbara Bloom, Barbara Owen and Stephanie S. Covington covering the research area of Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (379 citations), Clinical Psychology (366 citations) and General Health Professions (217 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w82221343 →

Countries where authors are citing Gender-Responsive Strategies Research, Practice, and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gender-Responsive Strategies Research, Practice, and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gender-Responsive Strategies Research, Practice, and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gender-Responsive Strategies Research, Practice, and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Gender-Responsive Strategies Research, Practice, and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Gender-Responsive Strategies Research, Practice, and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gender-Responsive Strategies Research, Practice, and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w82221343.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026