A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America
- Authors
- Roger Conant
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w82200942 →Countries where authors are citing A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America
This map shows the geographic impact of A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America
This network shows the impact of A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America.
About A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America
This paper, published in 1975, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Roger Conant covering the research area of Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (680 citations), Ecology (430 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (376 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w82200942.