More than fun and money. Worker motivation in crowdsourcing - a study on mechanical turk
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8217571 →Countries where authors are citing More than fun and money. Worker motivation in crowdsourcing - a study on mechanical turk
This map shows the geographic impact of More than fun and money. Worker motivation in crowdsourcing - a study on mechanical turk. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by More than fun and money. Worker motivation in crowdsourcing - a study on mechanical turk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites More than fun and money. Worker motivation in crowdsourcing - a study on mechanical turk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing More than fun and money. Worker motivation in crowdsourcing - a study on mechanical turk
This network shows the impact of More than fun and money. Worker motivation in crowdsourcing - a study on mechanical turk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the More than fun and money. Worker motivation in crowdsourcing - a study on mechanical turk.
About More than fun and money. Worker motivation in crowdsourcing - a study on mechanical turk
This paper, published in 2011, received 330 indexed citations . Written by Nicolas Kaufmann, Thimo Schulze and Daniel Veit covering the research area of Computer Science Applications and Safety Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Science Applications (237 citations), Sociology and Political Science (92 citations) and Communication (51 citations). Published in Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8217571.