Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings
Impact in
- Authors
- John A. Swets
- Journal
- Wiley eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8208318 →Countries where authors are citing Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings
This map shows the geographic impact of Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings
This network shows the impact of Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings.
About Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings
This paper, published in 1964, received 378 indexed citations . Written by John A. Swets. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (194 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (70 citations), Social Psychology (52 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (48 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (41 citations). Published in Wiley eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8208318.