Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart
Impact in
- Authors
- Alan P. BracheGeary A. Rummler
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w81924068 →Countries where authors are citing Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart
This map shows the geographic impact of Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart
This network shows the impact of Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart.
About Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart
This paper, published in 1990, received 668 indexed citations . Written by Alan P. Brache and Geary A. Rummler. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Information Systems (219 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (145 citations), Applied Psychology (134 citations), Strategy and Management (121 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (113 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w81924068.