Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice
- Authors
- Jennifer A. Moon
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w81858566 →Countries where authors are citing Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice
This map shows the geographic impact of Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice
This network shows the impact of Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice.
About Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice
This paper, published in 2005, received 917 indexed citations . Written by Jennifer A. Moon. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (680 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (151 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (114 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w81858566.