The Hip Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About Hip Hop--and Why It Matters

209 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2008, received 209 indexed citations. Written by Tricia Rose covering the research area of Music. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Music (150 citations), Sociology and Political Science (106 citations) and Cultural Studies (45 citations). Published in The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w81759552 →

Countries where authors are citing The Hip Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About Hip Hop--and Why It Matters

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Hip Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About Hip Hop--and Why It Matters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Hip Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About Hip Hop--and Why It Matters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Hip Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About Hip Hop--and Why It Matters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Hip Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About Hip Hop--and Why It Matters

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Hip Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About Hip Hop--and Why It Matters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Hip Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About Hip Hop--and Why It Matters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w81759552.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026