Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing
Impact in
- Education 444
- Authors
- John Mason
- Journal
- Open Research Online (The Open University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w81671221 →Countries where authors are citing Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing
This map shows the geographic impact of Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing
This network shows the impact of Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing.
About Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing
This paper, published in 2001, received 525 indexed citations . Written by John Mason. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (444 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (110 citations), Statistics and Probability (104 citations), Sociology and Political Science (67 citations) and Information Systems (27 citations). Published in Open Research Online (The Open University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w81671221.