Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning

526 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2006, received 526 indexed citations. Written by Silvia Gherardi and Davide Nicolini covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (204 citations), Sociology and Political Science (161 citations) and Strategy and Management (122 citations). Published in Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w81365421 →

Countries where authors are citing Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w81365421.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026