Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds

667 indexed citations
published 1992
Authors
M. H. Julien

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w8094745 →

Countries where authors are citing Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds.

About Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds

This paper, published in 1992, received 667 indexed citations . Written by M. H. Julien covering the research area of Insect Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Insect Science (596 citations), Plant Science (411 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (125 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w8094745.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026